Friday 6 February 2009

KM MODELS.........

knowledge management is a new era & it has its own importance now a days.

Why the models have evolved?

The models have been selected with a view to providing the widest perspective of KM as a whole.Problems seen in knowledge management is that knowledge is not spread equally in the organization.This is reason why we should follow a model.

Some of models i came across..........

Von krogh & Roos KM models (1995) differentiates b/w individual knowledge & social knowledge.In general human is the source of information.Then this information in our senses r manipulated for gaining knowledge & this knowledge is seen in external view to make it through logical views.

Nonaka & Takeuchi spiral model(SECI):

Knowledge is principally "group knowledge" which is converted , mobilised &transferred from one another.
example:Along the individual(researcher) to the group &then to the organisation from there to ontological dimension.One of the model named SECI was the secret for the success of japanese companies.It deals with socialisation,externalization,combination&internalization.

Socialisation:This is sharing the knowledge face to face through social interaction.Socialisation is amongst the easiest forms of exchange knowledge becuase this is what we do in cafeteria. In this there r drawbacks like these r rarely capture,noted.It remains only in mind.This may not result in transmitting and sharing(davenport & prusak 1998).

To improve brainstorming and knowledge cafes must be arranged frequently.

Externalisation:It gives a visible format for tacit knowledge to explicit knowledge.
example: A knowledge journalist is someone who can interview knowledge individuals in order to
extract ,model&synthesize.
HERE knowledge is tangible and permanent.

Combination:It is explicit to explicit knowledge.The process of recombining discrete pieces of explicit knowledge into new form.No new knowledge is created per see;it is a new combination or representation of existing or already explicit knowledge.
example:In developing a training course or curriculam for a university course,existing,explicit knowledge would be recombined into a form that better lends itself to teaching and transforming this content.

Internalization:
It mainly comes with learning while doing.Once knowledge is internalised it is then used by employees who broaden it,extend it & reframe it with in thier own existing knowledge.


So,finally knowledge ,experiences,best practices,lessons learned &so on go through the conversion process of socialisation,externalization,combination but they cant halt at any stages mentiond but only when knowledge is internalised.

REFERENCES:

1)Von krogh,G.,&Roos,j.,(1998)knowledge in firms:understanding managing,london stage publications,

2)Nonaka,l.,&takeuch,h.(1995).the knowledge creation community.Newyork:oxford university press

3)Davenport,t&prusak,l(1998)working knowledge boston:harvard business school press.

4)knowledge management in theory & practice.

5 comments:

  1. Hello Prasad,
    good that you have begun referencing style within text. You now need to:

    1) Refer to my comment made here
    for example, what was the book name?
    2)Apply?

    **
    Think of our organisation - The A-Team: is there SECI there?..

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello Prasad :), it is good that you have written about a model here - SECI.

    can you expand on this one: Von krogh & Roos KM models ? but give examples in relation to an organisation.

    1) find another model if possible.
    2) compare the models - what are good and bad in terms for the organisation and what does it not take into account.
    3) apply to organisation.
    4) which one do you think is better for the organisation that you choose? & why?

    As mentioned on many occasion before, go to the Hendon mdx library and book appointment so that they can show the vast range of resources available to do your research. Utilise this!

    For your KID, I need you to find about which & what scholars classified for each.

    1) Did the scholars take into account all 3?
    2) How each scholar defined each?
    3) Give an example from organisation point of view. Take for example - the airline you used to come to London. Did the organisation used all these?
    4) In what ways does KID impact the organisation? Remember the example we done on Thursday 29th meeting? I recal you asked a lot of questions to understand this, which you did, but now you just need to apply and express?

    ReplyDelete
  3. If you are stuck on library resources, visit Guides & Helpsheets

    Also for references management, you can use this software Refworks . If you get stuck on this, visit the above link mentioned of Guides & Helpsheets and then select Databases > & read:
    - RefWorks: Bibliographic Management
    - RefWorks: Write-N-Cite

    [There are so many organisation's out there, you see them everyday where ever you go or pass by. But these organisation's out there specialise in different area's which you can determine!]

    Take for example banks - you must have a bank account to pay fee's to the university? Where do you buy your food from? How do you travel to the places that you visit in London? Where do you buy clothes from? - These are just examples of businesses in the field to help you apply your readings to, so please do not take this too personally, as I am trying to help you but I am extremely time constrained with other issues in place. [Not in the form of socialisation]

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you man-chie....

    u helped me to improve....

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good Prasad you explain the theory....

    But I think the SECI model has limitations as it has been developed in Japanese cultural context and is based on manufacturing industry experience and Dave Snowden (2003) suggests many knowledge initiatives often fail as they focus too closely on the tacit to explicit section of the SECI model.

    ReplyDelete